This case study is part of a series highlighting how USAID is partnering with the private sector and local communities to strengthen land tenure in order to minimize the risks associated with large agricultural, forestry, energy and other investments. The series, which covers partnerships in Mozambique, Ghana and Kenya, demonstrates that bolstering local land rights can be good for both business and communities. For companies, it can reduce operational, financial and reputational risks. For local farmers, it can incentivize investments and increase access to finance. In sum, it can promote economic growth and build local resilience.

The Tenure and Global Climate Change project in Ghana implemented elements from The Analytical Framework for Land-Based Investments in African Agriculture. In Ghana, the project sought to address land tenure risks facing Hershey Corporation and their cocoa supplier ECOM’s production. Specifically, the project supported a participatory mapping process, as well as co-management and rehabilitation of cocoa farms. Additionally, the project sought to reduce pressures on cocoa producers who have historically expanded their farms into forested areas when cocoa trees become less productive.

The Challenge

Ghana is the world’s third largest cocoa producer. However, unclear rules between farmers and customary landowners as to who has the right to replant trees has led to insecure land rights. This is considered a primary reason for why farmers are not rehabilitating their cocoa crops and has taken a toll on the country’s cocoa production since the 1990s.

According to the Ghana Land Commission, an estimated two percent of farmland in the country is formally documented and registered. The rest is accessed through a complex web of agreements between customary officials and farmers.

“We landlords are conserving the chief’s land for the chief. If we allow the abunu [farmers] to cut the trees and replant the farm, it means that the land is becoming the abunu’s and the chief is losing his land. But the chief cannot lose his land. We do not want the abunu to control the land.”

Samuel Kwakye, a cocoa farmer & landlord

Up to 90 percent of cocoa in Ghana is produced by family farms. Tenant farmers agree to clear the land and plant cocoa trees. In return, the tenant receives half of the newly cleared and planted land once the trees mature. A landlord will then provide investments in the land and additional labor, while retaining the right to reclaim the land when it is not actively used for cocoa. Some landlords argue that if a tenant farmer replaces old and diseased cocoa trees, then they forfeit their rights to the land and must renegotiate the terms of the tenancy.

However, tenant farmers argue that their rights include replacing old and diseased cocoa trees. This disagreement produces an impasse, underming cocoa yields and putting pressure on farmers to clear forests for cocoa production rather than rehabilitating the land. Indeed, ever since cocoa arrived in Ghana 140 years ago, it has been a key driver of deforestation.

A study by Hershey Chocolate found that 96 percent of their farmers in Ghana rely on trees that are diseased or so old that they are well-past their productive years. This has led to a sharp decline in their yields and farmers’ abilities to earn a living.

“The problem is that people don’t have documents to their land. If your cocoa trees are old and you want to cut it, your landlord won’t allow it.”

Isaac Donkor, Cocoa Farmer

Few can afford the cost of rehabilitating a cocoa farm. The farmers who have the means to rehabilitate worry about losing their land and are less likely to invest in long-term improvements. But foregoing such improvements can often trap farmers in poverty and leaves chocolate companies without a reliable supply chain.

“Now, the cocoa is dying and we don’t have a penny. Now, there is no forest. Everywhere is cultivated. And there is no land left.”

Kofi Mensa, Cocoa Farmer

In this environment, farmers hold their land tenuously. This is particularly true in areas with population increases or large-scale land-based investments. This lack of security has long term consequences for how farmers work their land and for the cocoa sector at large.

The Innovation

The project came out of the interests of Hershey’s, ECOM and USAID to marry the needs of the cocoa sector with those of family farmers in a supply chain that encourages forest conservation and is able to produce cocoa far into the future.

With an understanding of the challenges that cocoa farmers’ face, the project has worked to strengthen their land rights and help finance the costly rehabilitation of farms.

“We know about agriculture. If there is a pest, we can identify it and advise farmers on how to treat it. But when the problem is land rights? We couldn’t have done this by ourselves. We needed USAID’s help.”

Olga Gormalova, General Manager, ECOM Agroindustrial’s Sustainable Management Services Ghana & Nigeria

The project:

  • Mapped 190 farms and their historical land use in a document certified by the traditional chief—37 percent of these farms are owned by women;
  • Rehabilitated 71 farms by replacing old, unproductive cocoa trees to increase productivity over the next five to 10 years;
  • Developed three model tenure templates based on customary norms for mapped farms;
  • Trained chiefs to mediate land disputes and advocate for farmers;
  • Instructed extension agents in agroforestry and tenure;
  • Financially and technically assisted farmers to cut old trees and replace them with more productive cocoa seedlings and other cash crops to improve farmers’ household income and food security.

These activities were designed to help cocoa farmers overcome the challenges that have prevented them from rehabilitating cocoa farms and to use secure documented land rights as a catalyst to increase cocoa yields, improve the livelihoods of farmers and reduce deforestation pressures.

Mary Avoka is a mother of six. She works two cocoa farms with her husband. On one of her farms, the cocoa trees are plagued with disease. Mary and her husband feared that if they invested in rehabilitating their farm, the newly improved land would be taken from them.

Mary’s farm was mapped by the USAID Responsible Investment Project. She hopes this will provide her family the security they need to begin to make improvements.

“We need this farm to feed and school our children.”

The Heroes

“This is a completely new idea. We are reaching so far into farms, managing farms, this is really something quite new. We were established as a supplier of cocoa. Then we became a supply chain manager, certifying cocoa as sustainable on behalf of the brands we work with. Now, this project has us working to deliver services to farms and farmers.”

Olga Gormalova, General Manager, ECOM Agroindustrial’s Sustainable Management Services Ghana and Nigeria

“We see this as model for the cocoa sector. Before, land tenure was something we thought we couldn’t do anything about. This project broke it down for us and made us realize that it is something we can engage on.”

Tawiah Agyarko-Kwarteng, Hershey’s West Africa Sustainable Sourcing Director

The Impact

190
farms mapped and documented
37%
owned by women
71
farms rehabilitated
5-10
years to increased productivity

The project outcomes show that secure land and tree tenure can benefit local communities and investors.

For Hershey’s and ECOM, the project provided a way to directly engage with communities and customary officials at the local level to secure land rights. ECOM is able to encourage farm rehabilitation that will secure higher yields of cocoa over time and develop a stronger supply chain for Hershey’s.

The project can also help both the government of Ghana and Hershey’s to meet their sustainability goals by reducing deforestation pressures in the cocoa sector.

There is a solid business case for creating prosperity in rural communities. Land rights definitely need to be tackled. They are a necessary layer in our business model.”

Olga Gormalova, General Manager, ECOM Agroindustrial’s Sustainable Management Services Ghana and Nigeria

“I think cocoa farming can be lucrative,” said cocoa farmer Isaac Donkor. “The problem for many cocoa farmers is that they don’t have documents for their land.”

“With papers,” continued Isaac, “you have freedom. You are secure.”

For local communities, the project addressed two key challenges that had discouraged cocoa farmers from investing in their farms to improve their harvests: insecure land rights and access to capital. By removing these hurdles, farmers are more likely to invest in their existing farm and boost their yield without cutting down the forest.

When my husband died, I worried that someone would come and take my land. Thanks to this project, now my land has been mapped and I feel secure. I can continue to farm and support my five children.”

Afi Vida, Cocoa Farmer

92 percent of farmers who received documentation through the project thought it was worthwhile.

The project helped farmers to improve their understanding of cocoa farming techniques in order to increase productivity. And to improve household incomes, the project helped farmers to diversify their cash crops instead of relying almost exclusively on cocoa.

“I want documents to give me security. The papers serve as proof so that no one can take the land from me. When I have documentation, I can replant the farm.”

Lamisi Avoka

Lessons learned from this project combined with best practices from the Analytical Framework for Responsible Land-Based Agricultural Investments can provide corporations with a powerful tool to meet sustainability commitments and implement international guidelines for responsible investment. What’s more, this project demonstrates that companies can respect and strengthen land and resource tenure rights, a consideration that may not have been a part of their manageable interest previously. Risks can be mitigated, governance strengthened and sustainability achieved.

The Implications

This project has illustrated how USAID is transforming the traditional donor-recipient aid model with one in which USAID acts as a development catalyst. It also has demonstrated how USAID partners with the private sector, civil society and other local actors to accelerate the journey to prosperity.

“Having documentation plays a major role in my decision to rehabilitate my land,” said Joseph Opoku whose land was mapped and rehabilitated by the project. “I now have the rights to this land and I am able to cut down the old cocoa trees.”

The private sector does not need to forgo investments in emerging markets because of risks associated with weak land tenure systems. Guidelines and implementing tools can help corporate actors navigate riskier climates. Investors and corporations can partner with communities to strengthen land rights, even in the absence of national government partnership, as a first step toward creating sustainable and mutually beneficial long-term investments.

While the project’s impact on deforestation will not be known for years to come, it did help demonstrate that community-based natural resource management can reduce pressures on farmers to encroach on nearby forested land. This could help to bring about forest regrowth. The project also improved communities’ awareness of the importance of shade trees and forest coverage, which will help make their cocoa crops be more sustainable.

Through the project activities, USAID and partners are using innovative solutions to mitigate land-based risks for both investors and communities and to achieve responsible investments that bring long-term and robust benefits.